On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 12:28:50 PM UTC-4, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > Yes, but the representation is quite inefficient. This would be an > efficient scalar type. >
Couldn't you just represent it by Dates.Second (if you want second resolution) or Dates.Millisecond (if you want millisecond resolution)? Or are you worried about entry and pretty-printing?
