Out of interest is there a definition of 1.0 ?
On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 12:29:19 AM UTC-4, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Julia might get Microsoft's attention at some point. You could go vote for > http://feedback.azure.com/forums/257792-machine-learning/suggestions/7668225-julia-support-in-azureml-studio, > > for one thing. > > The recently-released VS Code editor also looks very nice, and as soon as > it supports plugins it would be very worthwhile to look at making a Julia > plugin for it. > > I've also recently been in touch with someone from the Microsoft MPI team, > it might end up being tractable to get some libraries and Julia packages > that use MPI for parallelism to work on Windows too. We'll have to see. > > Regarding getting to Julia 1.0 faster, we also very badly need more > influence within the LLVM community. Keno has a large number of patches > open to make LLVM and MCJIT work better for Julia, but they're not getting > reviewed by enough people. Having Julia Computing get enough resources to > hire, say, the top few dozen contributors full-time would absolutely help > things advance faster, but I don't think it should be rushed either. > > > On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 6:07:05 PM UTC-7, Eric Forgy wrote: >> >> Very cool reading: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/11196 >> >> I occasionally write code, but to call myself a "developer" would be an >> insult to you guys who are doing awesome things :) >> >> If Julia apps are ever going to target enterprises in a serious manner, >> there absolutely must be solid support for Windows. I'll keep my eyes open >> for ways to help out. >> >> On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 8:32:31 PM UTC+8, Steven G. Johnson wrote: >>> >>> If you are a Windows developer, it would be great to have your help in >>> getting/keeping Julia running smoothly on Windows; only a few of the most >>> active developers use Windows regularly right now. Probably the biggest >>> improvement will be the transition to libgit (issue #11196), as the package >>> system on Windows is deathly slow at the moment. >>> >>
