The milestone flags are useful references (nothing really set in stone at this point though, AFAIK).
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A0.5 https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A1.0 On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Tony Kelman <[email protected]> wrote: > Aside from semver.org, I'm going to guess not yet. But I'm also not privy > to any private discussions that may have happened within Julia Computing. > (Hopefully we can avoid there needing to be too many of those related to > the language itself) > > > On Monday, May 18, 2015 at 1:41:17 PM UTC-7, Michael Francis wrote: >> >> Out of interest is there a definition of 1.0 ? >> >> On Sunday, May 17, 2015 at 12:29:19 AM UTC-4, Tony Kelman wrote: >>> >>> Julia might get Microsoft's attention at some point. You could go vote >>> for >>> http://feedback.azure.com/forums/257792-machine-learning/suggestions/7668225-julia-support-in-azureml-studio, >>> for one thing. >>> >>> The recently-released VS Code editor also looks very nice, and as soon >>> as it supports plugins it would be very worthwhile to look at making a >>> Julia plugin for it. >>> >>> I've also recently been in touch with someone from the Microsoft MPI >>> team, it might end up being tractable to get some libraries and Julia >>> packages that use MPI for parallelism to work on Windows too. We'll have to >>> see. >>> >>> Regarding getting to Julia 1.0 faster, we also very badly need more >>> influence within the LLVM community. Keno has a large number of patches >>> open to make LLVM and MCJIT work better for Julia, but they're not getting >>> reviewed by enough people. Having Julia Computing get enough resources to >>> hire, say, the top few dozen contributors full-time would absolutely help >>> things advance faster, but I don't think it should be rushed either. >>> >>> >>> On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 6:07:05 PM UTC-7, Eric Forgy wrote: >>>> >>>> Very cool reading: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/11196 >>>> >>>> I occasionally write code, but to call myself a "developer" would be an >>>> insult to you guys who are doing awesome things :) >>>> >>>> If Julia apps are ever going to target enterprises in a serious manner, >>>> there absolutely must be solid support for Windows. I'll keep my eyes open >>>> for ways to help out. >>>> >>>> On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 8:32:31 PM UTC+8, Steven G. Johnson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you are a Windows developer, it would be great to have your help in >>>>> getting/keeping Julia running smoothly on Windows; only a few of the most >>>>> active developers use Windows regularly right now. Probably the biggest >>>>> improvement will be the transition to libgit (issue #11196), as the >>>>> package >>>>> system on Windows is deathly slow at the moment. >>>>> >>>>
