Is there any chance for a debate whether or not to introduce a symbol for line-continuation? It could be optional. The reason I am asking is that I just wasted a day looking for a bug that was caused by an equivalent situation to the example below.
Christoph On Sunday, 30 November 2014 11:55:20 UTC, Christoph Ortner wrote: > > I think that the standard in mathematical typesetting is to write > 2 > + 3 > rather than > 2 + > 3 > > so personally I find the Matlab syntax easier to read. One of the very few > choices Julia made that I am not so sure about. > > Christoph > >
