I'm surprised so few people are bothered by this. Maybe it is just sloppy coders like myself who worry about it ;).
Christoph On Friday, 29 May 2015 00:04:46 UTC+1, Yichao Yu wrote: > > Sorry. Somehow the gmail hotkey got messed up... > > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Christoph Ortner > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > Is there any chance for a debate whether or not to introduce a symbol > for > > line-continuation? It could be optional. > > I would +1 on this. > > We can probably live without it but from time to time I find myself > looking for it. > > > The reason I am asking is that I just wasted a day looking for a bug > that > > was caused by an equivalent situation to the example below. > > > > Christoph > > > > On Sunday, 30 November 2014 11:55:20 UTC, Christoph Ortner wrote: > >> > >> I think that the standard in mathematical typesetting is to write > >> 2 > >> + 3 > >> rather than > >> 2 + > >> 3 > >> > >> so personally I find the Matlab syntax easier to read. One of the very > few > >> choices Julia made that I am not so sure about. > >> > >> Christoph > >> > > >
