segunda-feira, 14 de Setembro de 2015 às 09:26:05 UTC+1, Daniel Carrera escreveu: > > > On 14 September 2015 at 08:16, Uwe Fechner <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> While I understand your point, the success of a new programming language >> depends on the availability of a good IDE. >> > > No it doesn't. > > C, C++, Perl, Python, Fortran, JavaScript, PHP, and arguably even Java > became successful long before they acquired an IDE. I think that there are > more languages that became successful without an IDE than with one, so > let's not overstate the issue. An IDE is *good* to have because *some* > people want them. Good documentation is more important. Having the right > features and being at the right place at the right time is even more > important. >
Yes it does (IMO off course) I'm have many years of experience with Matlab and find its IDE a can't-work-without-it tool. When one experiments its debugger the reason becomes obvious.
