Well, Gambas for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambas
Am Montag, 14. September 2015 14:54:27 UTC+2 schrieb Sheehan Olver: > > Are there any open source languages with a "good" native IDE? > > I think IDEs are probably too painful to develop unless paid to do so.. > > > On 14 Sep 2015, at 10:31 pm, Tamas Papp <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Sep 14 2015, Joshua Ballanco <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> > >> It was really only later that projects were started to build “true” > Clojure IDEs, and still I don’t think any of these surpass (or even really > approach) the utility of the IDE plugins (the three IDEs of which I’m aware > are: LightTable, NightCode, and clooj). > >> > >> One important element that allowed much of this for Clojure was the > early development of nREPL, the network-enabled REPL. With this, all > editors/IDE plugins stand on equal footing with access to the REPL. I > noticed in the code to REPL.jl there’s a function `start_repl_server`, but > it doesn’t seem to be used anywhere. > >> > >> If I had to pick someplace to focus effort on improving tooling for > Julia in general, I’d look at improving/adding a network interface to the > REPL. > > > > I very much agree. Currently the Emacs interface uses ESS for Julia, > > which is not well-adapted to Julia for historical reasons. Having > > something like Swank or nREPL would make things much easier > > (non-blocking evaluation, integrated introspection, debugging, etc). > > > > Best, > > > > Tamas >
