Likely yes to both. Best to just test yourself, of course. I'm sure you know this, but you'll want to access them through the return values of findnz or equivalent, not using S[i,j].
--Tim On Monday, March 07, 2016 10:50:58 AM Anonymous wrote: > So I have a sparse matrix which doesn't get modified by for which I would > like to access by rows, is there significantly more overhead in accessing > rows vs columns? If so, would it be more efficient to instead access the > columns of its transpose?
