Thank you for the response, I read the 2015 discussion on here about CSR sparse matrices, do you happen to know the implementation status on when this will be included?
On Monday, March 7, 2016 at 4:59:40 PM UTC-8, Tim Holy wrote: > > Likely yes to both. Best to just test yourself, of course. > > I'm sure you know this, but you'll want to access them through the return > values of findnz or equivalent, not using S[i,j]. > > --Tim > > On Monday, March 07, 2016 10:50:58 AM Anonymous wrote: > > So I have a sparse matrix which doesn't get modified by for which I > would > > like to access by rows, is there significantly more overhead in > accessing > > rows vs columns? If so, would it be more efficient to instead access > the > > columns of its transpose? > >
