Yes, so far this is intended. We want a shape-preserving `collect` for implementing comprehensions, for example `collect(2x for x in A)`. However a case could be made that `collect` should continue to return only vectors, and the shape-preserving version should have a new name.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:41 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am not sure if this is the right place to post questions about version > 0.5.0-, but I'll give it a try anyhow. > > In 0.4.5, collect([1 2]) gives Array{Int64,1}, like a column vector. > > In 0.5.0_ (as of 25 May, Win64), collect([1 2]) gives Array{Int64,2}, like a > row vector. > > Is this intended? (...just struggling to prepare for the next release) > > /Paul S
