I've also discovered that collect(1) will now generate a 0-dimensional
Array, presumably as part of the same update, while collect([1]) still
generates a Vector. Is this intended too? If so, is there any way of
generating a Vector from either a Vector or a scalar - I was using collect
to do this up to now with 0.[34].x, 0.5-dev...?
Cheers,
Richard.
PS If it's a permanent change, the docs should be updated too:
Return an array of type Array{element_type,1} of all items in a collection.
On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 20:41:05 UTC+1, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure if this is the right place to post questions about version
> 0.5.0-, but I'll give it a try anyhow.
>
> In 0.4.5, collect([1 2]) gives Array{Int64,1}, like a column vector.
>
> In 0.5.0_ (as of 25 May, Win64), collect([1 2]) gives Array{Int64,2}, like
> a row vector.
>
> Is this intended? (...just struggling to prepare for the next release)
>
> /Paul S
>
