>If so, is there any way of generating a Vector from either a Vector or a scalar
vec(collect(x)) seems to work in both cases. /Paul S On Thursday, 26 May 2016 22:16:30 UTC+2, [email protected] wrote: > > I've also discovered that collect(1) will now generate a 0-dimensional > Array, presumably as part of the same update, while collect([1]) still > generates a Vector. Is this intended too? If so, is there any way of > generating a Vector from either a Vector or a scalar - I was using collect > to do this up to now with 0.[34].x, 0.5-dev...? > > Cheers, > > > Richard. > > PS If it's a permanent change, the docs should be updated too: > > Return an array of type Array{element_type,1} of all items in a > collection. > > > On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 20:41:05 UTC+1, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am not sure if this is the right place to post questions about version >> 0.5.0-, but I'll give it a try anyhow. >> >> In 0.4.5, collect([1 2]) gives Array{Int64,1}, like a column vector. >> >> In 0.5.0_ (as of 25 May, Win64), collect([1 2]) gives Array{Int64,2}, >> like a row vector. >> >> Is this intended? (...just struggling to prepare for the next release) >> >> /Paul S >> >
