Yes, Morten's additions to the package over the summer have really be great!
I'd also like to re-emphasise his call for feedback and suggestions (there's already been lots, but we're always looking for more) on the new HTML output, and the package in general. We want to end up with a documentation solution for Julia that any package author can simply pick up and use without having to worry about anything other than writing great content for their docs. It's definitely not there just yet, but we'll get there soon enough I'm sure. On Monday, 22 August 2016 18:58:43 UTC+2, David Anthoff wrote: > > Yes, this is really cool, much appreciated!! > > > > *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto: > [email protected] <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *Christoph Ortner > *Sent:* Saturday, August 20, 2016 6:56 PM > *To:* julia-users <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *Subject:* [julia-users] Re: ANN: Documenter.jl 0.3 > > > > this is really nice; thank you for putting this package together. > > On Saturday, 20 August 2016 12:36:21 UTC+1, Morten Piibeleht wrote: > > On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 2:18:37 AM UTC+3, Christoph Ortner wrote: > > I want to give this a try but I can't find the example of HTML output, > which is supposed to be in test/html? > > > > Thank you. > > > > I apologize, the linked docs are a bit outdated and will be updated > shortly. As was already mentioned, since Documenter uses the HTML output > for its own docs, `docs/make.jl` is the best example. > > > > `mkdocs.yml` has been dropped indeed. Instead the site's structure and > title have to be defined in `make.jl`, via the (currently undocumented) > `sitename` and `pages` options. > > > > The HTML site gets built into `build/` directly, where we normally have > outputted the processed Markdown files (with the filenames being translated > as `path/file.md` -> `path/file.html`). > > > > On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 2:53:23 AM UTC+3, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Morten Piibeleht <[email protected] > > wrote: > > [*] Developed as part of Morten’s Google Summer of Code project > <https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/dashboard/project/5046486001778688/details/> > . > > Since I think that page is private, here's the description of the project: > > > > Yes, the correct link should have been > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/projects/#5046486001778688 (but it > basically only contains the description Stefan already posted). > >
