I haven't inspected anything in detail, but I agree with Kristoffer that my first impression is that I really like the new look. Nice work, folks.
Best, --Tim On Monday, August 22, 2016 1:30:39 PM CDT Kristoffer Carlsson wrote: > Just from looking at the generated docs for the Documenter package I would > say that I strongly like the layout and "feel" of the HTML output. Much > better than what I have seen from using the Mkdocs. > > Maybe it is a bit redundant to have the base module name before all the > type and function names? > > On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 10:23:35 PM UTC+2, Michael Hatherly wrote: > > Yes, Morten's additions to the package over the summer have really be > > great! > > > > I'd also like to re-emphasise his call for feedback and suggestions > > (there's already been lots, but we're always looking for more) on the new > > HTML output, > > and the package in general. We want to end up with a documentation > > solution for Julia that any package author can simply pick up and use > > without having > > to worry about anything other than writing great content for their docs. > > It's definitely not there just yet, but we'll get there soon enough I'm > > sure. > > > > On Monday, 22 August 2016 18:58:43 UTC+2, David Anthoff wrote: > >> Yes, this is really cool, much appreciated!! > >> > >> > >> > >> *From:* julia...@googlegroups.com [mailto:julia...@googlegroups.com] *On > >> Behalf Of *Christoph Ortner > >> *Sent:* Saturday, August 20, 2016 6:56 PM > >> *To:* julia-users <julia...@googlegroups.com> > >> *Subject:* [julia-users] Re: ANN: Documenter.jl 0.3 > >> > >> > >> > >> this is really nice; thank you for putting this package together. > >> > >> On Saturday, 20 August 2016 12:36:21 UTC+1, Morten Piibeleht wrote: > >> > >> On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 2:18:37 AM UTC+3, Christoph Ortner wrote: > >> > >> I want to give this a try but I can't find the example of HTML output, > >> which is supposed to be in test/html? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> > >> > >> I apologize, the linked docs are a bit outdated and will be updated > >> shortly. As was already mentioned, since Documenter uses the HTML output > >> for its own docs, `docs/make.jl` is the best example. > >> > >> > >> > >> `mkdocs.yml` has been dropped indeed. Instead the site's structure and > >> title have to be defined in `make.jl`, via the (currently undocumented) > >> `sitename` and `pages` options. > >> > >> > >> > >> The HTML site gets built into `build/` directly, where we normally have > >> outputted the processed Markdown files (with the filenames being > >> translated > >> as `path/file.md` -> `path/file.html`). > >> > >> > >> > >> On Saturday, August 20, 2016 at 2:53:23 AM UTC+3, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Morten Piibeleht <morten.p...@gmail.com > >> > >> > wrote: > >> [*] Developed as part of Morten’s Google Summer of Code project > >> <https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/dashboard/project/5046486001778688/d > >> etails/> . > >> > >> Since I think that page is private, here's the description of the > >> project: > >> > >> > >> > >> Yes, the correct link should have been > >> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/projects/#5046486001778688 (but it > >> basically only contains the description Stefan already posted).
