there should be no reason you can't increase your 'mpls infrastructure'
MTU to something larger, eg: 4470 or otherwise. Some providers have gone as
far as increasing the internal MTU to the 9k range. This can have some
serious wins in some cases, eg: tcp performance as it relates to
ibgp messages.
- jared
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 05:46:48PM +0200, Jonas Frey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i'am looking to deploy a vlan-ccc l2circuit (via MPLS). The customer
> wants to use MPLS himself on this circuit so i am wondering what MTU
> would be needed for this to work. I am calculating with 1526 bytes, is
> this correct?
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Jonas
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
