Gabriel: What kind of flows and variations exist in your traffic? Regardless of the loadbalance configuration, without enough variance, traffic distribution will be polarized.
Regards, Addy. On 4/5/10, Gabriel Farias <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I configured the router the suggested parameters in URL: > > {master}[edit] > > RT110# show policy-options policy-statement load-balance > > term 1 { > > then { > > load-balance per-packet; > > } > > } > > > > RT110# show routing-options > > forwarding-table { > > export load-balance; > > } > > RT110# show forwarding-options > > load-balance { > > indexed-next-hop; > > } > > hash-key { > > family inet { > > layer-3; > > layer-4; > > } > > } > > The continuing imbalance in the physical interfaces: > > {master}[edit] > > RT110# run show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate > > Input rate: 520010728 bps (98183 pps) > > Output rate: 585910320 bps (176371 pps) > > > > {master}[edit] > > RT110# run show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate > > Input rate: 621317752 bps (107767 pps) > > Output rate: 107517264 bps (17319 pps) > > > The configuration is correct? Or we would have to configure within the > routing-instances dados. > > > Thanks > > Gabriel Farias > > > > 2010/4/5 Serge Vautour <[email protected]> > >> Hello, >> >> eBGP shouldn't come into play here. Your physical interfaces are bundled >> as >> 1 logical interface (ae0). Load balancing over L3 LAG interfaces works the >> same as ECMP links. You have to configure this: >> >> >> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-policy/policy-configuring-per-packet-load-balancing.html >> >> Stefan has suggested this below. Have you tried it?. Can you post your >> relevant config? >> >> What I find weird is you do have some egress traffic on both physical >> links. It's just not even close to being balanced. Without any load >> balancing configs, I would expect to see 0 bps on one link. Do you have >> enough flows? If most of your traffic is generated from just a few flows, >> you may not be able to get much better. >> >> Serge >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Gabriel Farias <[email protected]> >> To: mail-list <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Sent: Mon, April 5, 2010 1:20:33 PM >> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >> Stefan, >> >> This configuration has no effect, because the connection (PE x CE) uses >> EBGP >> routing within the VRF dados. >> >> What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces of >> RT110, you have any other suggestions? >> >> Thanks >> Gabriel Farias >> >> >> >> 2010/4/5 mail-list <[email protected]> >> >> > try this and see if it makes any difference... >> > >> > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-1 >> > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls payload ip >> > or >> > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-1 >> > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls label-2 >> > set forwarding-options hash-key family mpls payload ip >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Gabriel Farias < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> Stefan, >> >> >> >> Any suggestions to correct this imbalance? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gabriel Farias >> >> >> >> 2010/4/1 Gabriel Farias <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> > Sorry for my bad translation, follows the configuration: >> >> > >> >> > *Interfaces*: >> >> > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/0 >> >> > description "*BA* G2/47 - SW001"; >> >> > gigether-options { >> >> > 802.3ad ae0; >> >> > } >> >> > show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/3 >> >> > description "*BA* G1/47 - SW001"; >> >> > gigether-options { >> >> > 802.3ad ae0; >> >> > } >> >> > show configuration interfaces ae0 >> >> > description "*BA* Po150 - SW001"; >> >> > mtu 9192; >> >> > unit 0 { >> >> > family inet { >> >> > address 10.251.40.53/30; >> >> > } >> >> > } >> >> > >> >> > *VRF instances*: >> >> > show configuration routing-instances dados >> >> > instance-type vrf; >> >> > interface ae0.0; >> >> > ... >> >> > protocols { >> >> > bgp { >> >> > group PEER-SW001 { >> >> > type external; >> >> > hold-time 30; >> >> > peer-as 65100; >> >> > as-override; >> >> > neighbor 10.251.40.54; >> >> > } >> >> > } >> >> > >> >> > What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical >> >> > interfaces, >> >> see >> >> > that is constant unbalance >> >> > >> >> > {master} >> >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate >> >> > Input rate : 271677184 bps (69055 pps) >> >> > Output rate : 37802544 bps (10429 pps) >> >> > >> >> > {master} >> >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate >> >> > Input rate : 293302512 bps (61095 pps) >> >> > Output rate : 628471504 bps (134276 pps) >> >> > >> >> > {master} >> >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate >> >> > Input rate : 298597864 bps (70456 pps) >> >> > Output rate : 34856992 bps (8756 pps) >> >> > >> >> > {master} >> >> > RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate >> >> > Input rate : 288075200 bps (57232 pps) >> >> > Output rate : 657782056 bps (129224 pps) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <[email protected]> >> >> > >> >> >> I'm sorry, your request is getting lost in translation. Why don't >> >> >> you >> >> just >> >> >> show us your configs and do a 'show route x.x.x.x' and 'show route >> >> >> forwarding-table destination x.x.x.x' for the route you are trying >> >> >> to >> >> >> load-balance. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Stefan Fouant >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> *From: * Gabriel Farias <[email protected]> >> >> >> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:51:04 -0300 >> >> >> *To: *<[email protected]> >> >> >> *Cc: *<[email protected]>; < >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> > >> >> >> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm not using EBGP external type in PE (M120) >> >> >> >> >> >> Reagards, >> >> >> Gabriel Farias >> >> >> >> >> >> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Do you have multi-path enabled on your EBGP sessions? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Stefan Fouant >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >> >>> ------------------------------ >> >> >>> *From: * Gabriel Farias <[email protected]> >> >> >>> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:32:18 -0300 >> >> >>> *To: *<[email protected]> >> >> >>> *Cc: *<[email protected]>; < >> >> >>> [email protected]> >> >> >>> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I have a section between EBGP VRF PE x CE via two physical >> connections >> >> >>> (aggregate ethernet) and see the traffic unbalanced because the >> Junos >> >> uses >> >> >>> the default flow. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I need the traffic between the PE x CE is symmetrically balanced >> way, >> >> the >> >> >>> previous setting and did not work, and within the configuration >> >> >>> routing-instance <name> not have all the options. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Thanks >> >> >>> Gabriel Farias >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <[email protected]> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> You need the following: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> 'set routing-option forwarding-table export load-balance' >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> and >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> 'set policy-options policy-statement load-balance then >> >> >>>> load-balance >> >> >>>> per-packet' >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Sorry for the top-post, I'm on my Blackberry. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> HTHs. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Stefan Fouant >> >> >>>> ------Original Message------ >> >> >>>> From: Gabriel Farias >> >> >>>> Sender: [email protected] >> >> >>>> To: [email protected] >> >> >>>> Subject: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos >> >> >>>> Sent: Mar 31, 2010 4:23 PM >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Hi members, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> How to balance traffic between EBGP equipment Juniper M120 (PE) x >> >> Cisco >> >> >>>> 6509 >> >> >>>> (CE) Switch, which are connected via ethernet aggregated? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I used the setup below and did not work the Juniper continues with >> >> the >> >> >>>> output unbalanced traffic. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> configuration forwarding-options >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> load-balance { >> >> >>>> indexed-next-hop; >> >> >>>> } >> >> >>>> hash-key { >> >> >>>> family inet { >> >> >>>> layer-3; >> >> >>>> layer-4; >> >> >>>> } >> >> >>>> } >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Gabriel Farias >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> >> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >> >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________ >> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the >> boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to >> New Mail today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca >> > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Sent from my mobile device _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
