On Tuesday 29 June 2010 04:05:55 pm Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > So far things aren't looking good.
Very, very nasty, indeed. Hope you have JTAC running around on this. Would be glad to hear what comes of it. Nasty, indeed. On my end, while away on tour, Juniper came back and took back a test MX80 and got it reinstalled with a more stable version of JUNOS 10.2. The previous one was causing regular Gig-E SFP modules to output a rather weak laser, and the remote devices didn't have any clue that there was anything the other side (850nm, no less). The box came back with a newer JUNOS and fixed laser power. Yet to follow-up with details, but it's odd. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
