Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about this kind of stuff ;)
We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality - some are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely it's not perfect). We've been bitten by some surprises as well ... so I'm not disagreeing, just saying that we're pretty used to these issues we've encountered and don't deploy if we know they will come up. Typically, we use them as site to site VPN boxes along with firewalling. I have an SRX210 at my home as well - run the full UTM suite on it and had no real issues (granted it's a home environment to be fair). RAS, can you share a few highlights of "broken"? Appreciate it, Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: September-01-11 11:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826 On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the > only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider > returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to > describe it, my condolences to anyone who actually needs to run these > things in production. Is this for routing functionality, or firewall functionality? We're using one as an MPLS PE, and it seems to be working ok, but given what you've said... gulp! Is there a good summary of the problems anywhere, or do I need to trawl the archives? _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
