Weird, I have a number of SRX210s running 10.4Rx and have had no notable issues at all. Now 9.x code was a totally different story. I work out of my home office, so my main 210 has to be working all the time, which it does just fine.
Currently Running: ADSL2+ PIM for uplink, 10Mb V4 + V6 (both flow) AX411 WLAN Few GRE tunnels COS using MFC filters NAT: Source and Destination A handful of V4/V6 BGP sessions I have a second SRX210 sitting next to it as a cold spare if I need it, but have never needed it. I use MRTG to graph my resource utilization on it (including flows), just to keep an eye on things and have been satisfied with the performance. Regards, -Jeff On Sep 1, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Paul Stewart wrote: > We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed - do you remember > what version of JunOS you were running by chance? > > > > Paul > > > > > > From: Nathan Sipes [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: September-01-11 12:05 PM > To: Paul Stewart > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826 > > > > I have had similar experiences to Richard's with the "Free SRX210H" I even > managed to get a DSL PIM in there as well. Had it up and working for about 2 > months when the pim quit forwarding traffic randomly. Rebooting the SRX > seems to fix it well enough though... I will say that the free hardware has > cost a lot of my time and some annoyed phone calls from my wife when netflix > doesn't work. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about this > kind of stuff ;) > > We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality - some > are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely it's > not perfect). We've been bitten by some surprises as well ... so I'm not > disagreeing, just saying that we're pretty used to these issues we've > encountered and don't deploy if we know they will come up. Typically, we use > them as site to site VPN boxes along with firewalling. > > I have an SRX210 at my home as well - run the full UTM suite on it and had > no real issues (granted it's a home environment to be fair). > > RAS, can you share a few highlights of "broken"? > > Appreciate it, > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers > Sent: September-01-11 11:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826 > > > On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > >> I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the >> only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider >> returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to >> describe it, my condolences to anyone who actually needs to run these >> things in production. > > Is this for routing functionality, or firewall functionality? > > We're using one as an MPLS PE, and it seems to be working ok, but given > what you've said... gulp! > > Is there a good summary of the problems anywhere, or do I need to trawl > the archives? > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
