That may be the difference I am running the SRX-MP-1VDSL2-A PIM.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Jerry Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Mine here at home has been working well, with the internal ADSL2. > > Only initial issue I had were the dumb MTU and MSS defaults. > > Only time it gets rebooted is when I pull the wrong cord.... > > Now I need to fix DDNS. Had it working on 10.1, but 10.4 and 11.x break it > again. > > > > On Sep 1, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Nathan Sipes wrote: > > 10.4R2 and 11.1R2 The local interzone traffic continued to forward and > traffic sourced from the outside interface continued to work. > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed – do you remember > > what version of JunOS you were running by chance?**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Paul**** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > > > *From:* Nathan Sipes [mailto:[email protected]] > > *Sent:* September-01-11 12:05 PM > > *To:* Paul Stewart > > *Cc:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826**** > > > > ** ** > > > > I have had similar experiences to Richard's with the "Free SRX210H" I > even > > managed to get a DSL PIM in there as well. Had it up and working for > about 2 > > months when the pim quit forwarding traffic randomly. Rebooting the SRX > > seems to fix it well enough though... I will say that the free hardware > has > > cost a lot of my time and some annoyed phone calls from my wife when > netflix > > doesn't work. **** > > > > > > > > **** > > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> > wrote: > > **** > > > > Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about > this > > kind of stuff ;) > > > > We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality - > some > > are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely > it's > > not perfect). We've been bitten by some surprises as well ... so I'm not > > disagreeing, just saying that we're pretty used to these issues we've > > encountered and don't deploy if we know they will come up. Typically, we > > use > > them as site to site VPN boxes along with firewalling. > > > > I have an SRX210 at my home as well - run the full UTM suite on it and > had > > no real issues (granted it's a home environment to be fair). > > > > RAS, can you share a few highlights of "broken"? > > > > Appreciate it, > > Paul > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers > > Sent: September-01-11 11:35 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826**** > > > > > > On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > > >> I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the > >> only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider > >> returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to > >> describe it, my condolences to anyone who actually needs to run these > >> things in production. > > > > Is this for routing functionality, or firewall functionality? > > > > We're using one as an MPLS PE, and it seems to be working ok, but given > > what you've said... gulp! > > > > Is there a good summary of the problems anywhere, or do I need to trawl > > the archives? > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp**** > > > > ** ** > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
