That was my initial recollection as well. Seems we used to need keep-all to even see such a hidden route.
I guess it changes at some point. Regards From: Ivan Ivanov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:51 AM To: John Neiberger Cc: Harry Reynolds; [email protected]; Mohammad Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv4 iBGP routes Hi, Harry, in JNCIP study guide is written that if route is discarded because of AS loop it's not stored in RIB. So it should not be visible with 'hidden' switch. Or I am wrong and the case here is different. Thanks! On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:29, John Neiberger <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks! I just heard from another one of our engineers who is much more familiar with Juniper than I am. He already knew about this, so I was just a little slow on the uptake. lol Thanks to all for the help. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Harry Reynolds <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Yes, I believe that is enough to cause your issue. > > I believe that independent domain might help with the global as loop check, > but it too is global and needs to be carefully tested. > > Else use as loops, which should also be tested. ;) Adding will flap bgp IIRC. > > Regards > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Neiberger > [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:55 PM > To: Harry Reynolds > Cc: Mohammad; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv4 iBGP routes > > We do have the following configured under bgp: > > group SomeGroupName { > type external; > traceoptions { > file ipv4-ebgp-customer-logs size 10m files 10; > flag state; > } > description "SomeGroup"; > family inet { > unicast; > } > remove-private; > local-as XXXXX private; > } > > I wish I could post that stuff without editing. hehe Is that enough > to break things? And if so, what is the fix? > > Thanks! > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Harry Reynolds > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Are there any vrfs on this box using AS XXXX? >> >> In JUNOS AS loop check is global, so also applies to any vrfs and their >> configured asns. >> >> HTHs >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> >> [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] >> On Behalf Of John Neiberger >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:17 PM >> To: Mohammad >> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Hidden IPv4 iBGP routes >> >> Okay, there is no local AS configured under protocols bgp, and the AS >> configured under routing options is correct. >> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:11 PM, John Neiberger >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> I'll do that right now. I checked the AS under routing-options, but >>> didn't check for a local-as. Thanks! I'm very new to Juniper, so I'm >>> still pretty lost. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Mohammad >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> I think you need to check the autonomous-system under the routing-options >>>> hierarchy; and the local-as under protocols bgp group hierarchy; >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Mohammad Salbad >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list >>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Best Regards! Ivan Ivanov _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
