PPPoE will work for you if you have a layer 2 between your DSLAM and your MX5 but that will not be an LNS!; in my case I have an additional leg from which there will be IP thus needing L2TP; which means that my bundled sessions will MLPPPoLNS (sometimes call MLPPPoLTTP).
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthias Brumm Sent: 27 March 2012 16:08 To: Paul Stewart Cc: Liam Murphy; [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS Hi! We have just ordered some MX5 to have the opportunity to provide PPPoE for customers. What exactly is the meaning of lacking LNS support? If I understand correctly LNS is the possibility to provide a tunnel endpoint for a L2TP tunnel, sent from a provider, for example a DSL provider. The MX80(5) is capable of provide a PPPoE termination, if I have L2 access to the DSLAMs or access switches? Regards, Matthias Am 26. März 2012 14:23 schrieb Paul Stewart <[email protected]>: > I'm not up to speed on the MLPPP stuff but would look at > MX240/MX480/MX960 platform for sure. The MX80 can only handle about > 4k sessions and has no support for LNS yet I don't believe (coming though if > I'm not mistaken). > > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Liam Murphy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: March-26-12 6:30 AM > To: Paul Stewart; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS > > About 4000 sessions. > I am just not sure if I can have MLPPPoLT2P > > (i.e. up to 8 ppp sessions bundled inside a MLPPP session that > terminates on a Juniper that is acting as an LNS, with subscriber QoS). > > Thanks! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart > Sent: 23 March 2012 20:40 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS > > What kind of capacity? M/MX is only option outside of E/ERX series... > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Liam Murphy > Sent: March-23-12 1:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper BRAS > > Which Juniper router (not E-Series) is best suited for a BRAS. > (L2TP LNS with MLPPP) > > Regards > > Liam > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
