The MX using Trio/MPC line cards support inline IPFIX for flow statistics. No services card required. Just have to be sure your collector supports it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_Flow_Information_Export Thank you, -- Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875 Sr. Systems Engineer Juniper Networks From: Serge Vautour <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: Serge Vautour <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:55:39 -0700 To: Doug Hanks <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006 Note that the MX requires an MS-DPC card in order to to NetFlow v9. Serge ________________________________ From: Doug Hanks <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: Peter <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:41:24 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] mx240 vs asr 9006 The last time I looked the ASR9K still had a small FIB and tapped out at around 500K. Thank you, -- Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875 Sr. Systems Engineer Juniper Networks On 4/24/12 8:55 AM, "Peter" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >Hi > >I have to upgrade my bgp routers, i have budget for two options: > >1. >- bundle: MX240BASE-AC-HIGH, MPC1-3D-R-B, MIC-3D-20XGE-SFP, >MIC-3D-2XGE-XFP; configurable RE, SCB, and PEM >- better routing engine RE-S-1800X2-8G-UPG-BB + jflow license ( netflow >v9 or ipfix) S-ACCT-JFLOW-IN > >or > >2. asr 9006 >- A9K-RSP-4G >- A9K-MOD80-TR, 80G Modular Linecard, Packet Transport Optimized >- license for l3 vpn > >the price is almost the same. I need: > >- ports: from 4x10G line to max 8x10G, line rate >- 3 virtual routers with full ip routing table v4 >- 10 virtual routers with ca 10k prefix in routing table v4 >- v6 >- up to 12 full bgp feed >- netflow v9 or ipfix, sampling max 100/s >- define counters on logical and physical interfaces, count many times >to the same counter, one packet could be count to different counters in >next term >- access to counters via snmp >- independent control plane and data plane >- and few others things on bgp edge > >which model will be better ? >thanks for some advice > >regards >Peter > >_______________________________________________ >juniper-nsp mailing list >[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
