Yes thanks for mentioning that. My opinion would be to use a MX480 like someone else said just due to the increased slot capacity, over the 9006 or 240.
Phil On Apr 25, 2012, at 9:33 AM, brad dreisbach <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:31:13PM -0400, Phil Bedard wrote: >> If you are using the newer RSP440 and newer linecards it is substantially >> higher, 2M+ IPv4. But you are right the first gen cards the original poster >> had speced only support 512K in the FIB and we are at 400K+ now in the >> Internet table. > > You can configure the scale profile on the trident based cards to support 1M > routes on RSP2. you do sacrifice some L2 scale though, iirc. > > default —efficient for deployments that require large Layer 2 MAC tables (up > to 512,000 entries) and a relatively small number of Layer 3 routes (less > than 512,000). > > l3 —efficient for deployments that require more Layer 3 routes (up to 1 > million) and smaller Layer 2 MAC tables (less than 128,000 entries). > > l3xl —efficient for deployments that require a very large number of Layer 3 > routes (up to 1.3 million) and minimal Layer 2 functionality. Note that the > support for up to 1.3 million routes is split into IPv4 scaled support and > IPv4/IPV6 scaled support. You can configure up to 1.3 million IPv4 routes, or > up to 1 million IPv4 routes with 128,000 IPv6 routes. > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4.2/system_management/configuration/guide/b_sysman_cg42asr9k_chapter_01.html#task_3A082F6CD31D4A238070C3CD7279E67A > > -b > >> >> Phil >> >> On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:41 PM, Doug Hanks <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The last time I looked the ASR9K still had a small FIB and tapped out at >>> around 500K. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> -- >>> Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875 >>> Sr. Systems Engineer >>> Juniper Networks >>> >>> >>> On 4/24/12 8:55 AM, "Peter" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I have to upgrade my bgp routers, i have budget for two options: >>>> >>>> 1. >>>> - bundle: MX240BASE-AC-HIGH, MPC1-3D-R-B, MIC-3D-20XGE-SFP, >>>> MIC-3D-2XGE-XFP; configurable RE, SCB, and PEM >>>> - better routing engine RE-S-1800X2-8G-UPG-BB + jflow license ( netflow >>>> v9 or ipfix) S-ACCT-JFLOW-IN >>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> 2. asr 9006 >>>> - A9K-RSP-4G >>>> - A9K-MOD80-TR, 80G Modular Linecard, Packet Transport Optimized >>>> - license for l3 vpn >>>> >>>> the price is almost the same. I need: >>>> >>>> - ports: from 4x10G line to max 8x10G, line rate >>>> - 3 virtual routers with full ip routing table v4 >>>> - 10 virtual routers with ca 10k prefix in routing table v4 >>>> - v6 >>>> - up to 12 full bgp feed >>>> - netflow v9 or ipfix, sampling max 100/s >>>> - define counters on logical and physical interfaces, count many times >>>> to the same counter, one packet could be count to different counters in >>>> next term >>>> - access to counters via snmp >>>> - independent control plane and data plane >>>> - and few others things on bgp edge >>>> >>>> which model will be better ? >>>> thanks for some advice >>>> >>>> regards >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
