J-series is still using P4 class cpu ,ddr2 memory, where as it is really cheap to upgrade them for now (I bought ~50$ from ebay , 3G cpu, 2.5G ram and it handles several copies of full bgp feed just fine) , it is clear that is not going to last long, they are heading for EOL really soon in my opinion.
Forcing j-series to be a security router is a joke, i totally agree though. Speaking of 9.3, i have been running them for almost 2 years now, and it is working great, all the features are there(only ipesc v1 though and it is buggy) and given 10.4 is so horribly slow, I simply have 0 intend to upgrade them. Cheers. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Michel de Nostredame <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, 叶雨飞 <[email protected]> wrote: >> downgrade to 9.3R4.4 then > > Unfortunately 9.3 is already EOLed ( > http://www.juniper.net/support/eol/junos.html ) > > Tuning J/SRX into packet-mode will lost several valuable functions > such as IPsec, Jflow... those are very important for small business. > > Selective-packet-mode is also a huge pain from operation point of > view, also the Jflow will have problem under this. > > I believe the best solution is to keep pushing Juniper to bring > packet-mode OS back to J-series with full functionality. > > At this moment, Juniper does not have product, my personal opinion, to > head-to-head compete against Cisco ISR. J-series could be the most > closed product line to fill this gap. > > -- > Michel~ > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
