Could you ask them to use a routing protocol and implement some logic on their side dictating when they advertise a default to you?
Morgan On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ahmad Hasan <[email protected]>wrote: > BFD is not a valid option because the other end is cisco and the customer > is > using PBR, so based on their feedback they can't implement BFD along with > PBR on cisco side > > BR, > A.Hasan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Kawchuk [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 3:47 AM > To: Ahmad Hasan > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] IP Monitoring/Tracking (SLA) on high end SRX > > How about a default 0.0.0.0/0 with a bfd-liveliness detection. > > We use this for conditionally routing statics every now and then. > > Works well assuming the next-hop supports BFD; and no dynamic routing > protocol needed. > > - CK. > > > On 16/08/2013, at 7:15 AM, Darren O'Connor <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You could run VRRP on R1 and R2 giving R1 the higher priority. Have > > the static default on the SRX3600 pointing to the VRRP IP > > > > Darren > > http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie > > > > > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:16:49 +0300 > >> Subject: [j-nsp] IP Monitoring/Tracking (SLA) on high end SRX > >> > >> Dear All > >> > >> > >> > >> We have high end SRX3600 connected to layer2 switch and then to two > >> gateway routers, and we have a static default route to R1 with > >> default preference > >> (5) and to R2 with preference 10, we need to track the IP of R1 so > >> that in case we couldn't ping R1 the route to prefer R2 i.e. in case > >> the link between R1 and the layer2 switch went down the route to prefer > R2. > >> > >> Noting that we were able to accomplish the above requirements with > >> branch SRX using either two options (set services ip-monitoring) or > >> (set services > >> rpm) > >> > >> Unfortunately the mentioned commands are not supported on high end > >> SRX > >> > >> Any ideas. > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> A.Hasan > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Thanks, Morgan _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
