They're both different products. VRR is already available. It's pure control-plane without forwarding-plane. Let's something like JCS1200 but for own Hypervisor deployment. vMX is full featured router with same control-plane as VRR have. Same like Cisco CSR 1000V or Brocade vRouter 5400/5600.
So VRR == vMX without forwarding-plane. Maybe cost wise VRR will be cheaper than vMX, don't know. We will see in Q1 2015 when vMX should be available. Rob On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, December 01, 2014 04:41:54 PM Robert Hass wrote: > > > vMX indeed will be full-featured router. But my questions > > was related to move part of control-plane (basically > > whole BGP part of rpd) to external server. Maybe > > OpenFlow somehow helps here ? How openflow take care of > > eBGP to customers ? Session should be on router or on > > OpenFlow controller ? OF v1.3 just has been implemented > > in JunOS 14.x releases for MX series. > > That's a little too cutting edge (even) for me :-). > > My guess is vRR is a function of vMX. No point in having two > products. I could be wrong... > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
