On Monday, December 01, 2014 05:27:23 PM Phil Bedard wrote: > Juniper as far as I know plans on maintaining two > versions of the vMX at least to start with. The vRR > version is similar to the one used for things like lab > testing and uses 1 VM with both the vRE and vPFE > integrated. The vRR is not meant to be in the > forwarding path just like the vRR offerings from ALU and > Cisco. You would not really want to use it to terminate > eBGP sessions.
Don't know about the ALU offering, but Cisco don't have a vRR-type solution. CSR1000v is a full-fledged router. What you can do and how much traffic you can forward through it is all controlled by what license you buy. I find this a better use of vendor resources than maintaining two separate tracks. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
