On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Tim Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > L3/MPLS LSR - Great experience, one issue currently in 14.1X53-D15 is any > traffic that would have been sent an ICMP redirect (even with that turned > off) will be duplicated.. One copy forwarded through the RE, one copy > through T2 caused by PR1022354 (there are other scenarios that can cause > this, too.. and this is still unfixed).. I think in 13.x there is an LDP > bug (PR889585), but it's easy to work around. > > L2 - Several issues with it.. DHCPv4 Traffic in I think up to 13.2X53-D25 > in L2 will be silently discarded (punted to the RE as you can see this > traffic by doing monitor traffic).. 14.1X53-D10+ fixes this (maybe > 13.2X53-D25). DHCPv6 traffic is still broken in even 14.1X53-D15, no PR for > that one yet.
Do you have DHCPv4 enabled in any other way? Ex dhcp-relay? I ask, b/c, on an unrelated platform (aaaand entirely different JunOS versions- MX960s and EX9214s) we ran into - turning on dhcp-relay will cause them to punt all UDP port 67 traffic. Even if it's on an interface that isn't mentioned in the config. I haven't had a chance yet to see if that happens to all logical instances or just the LI that the dhcp-relay or dhcp features are enabled on. Like I said, unrelated platform, but, effectively the same thing. > > I've also had several QFX5100-96S boxes reboot without reason (on software > all the way up to 14.1X53-D10), 0 logs, like they were powered off.. Still > haven't found the root cause of this one yet, we're suspecting a bad batch > of hardware possibly. > > I have several that are about to enter a mixed L2+L3/MPLS P/PE role soon.. > MC-LAG+L2+L3/MPLS+L3VPN all on a pair.. So far with testing that there > haven't been any issues outside of the previously mentioned L2 gotchas. > > > In general the experience has been pretty positive with them outside of a > few L2 snafus.. I'm also not using the boxes in a traditional DC role, > these are all SP roles.. > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Richard Hartmann < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I was wondering what experience, if any, you have had with QFX5100. >> >> Of special interest would be what JunOS version you are running, what >> features you have enabled, and if you consider them production-ready. >> >> >> This question is open-ended on purpose. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- "Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors into trouble of all kinds." -- Samuel Butler _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
