Hello Matthew,

This looks like yet another sales guy craziness and the answer should have been 
no way.
I'm wondering how your OPS folks are going to support this aggregate-fw-filter 
based policing. 
As in couple of months no one is going to recall there are some PFE 
restrictions.


adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Matthew Crocker
> Sent: 07 April 2015 22:16
> To: jnsp list
> Subject: [j-nsp] Aggregate policer config
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  A customer with two connections to my mx240.  I want to police their total
> bandwidth to 800mbps. Right now I have a 800mbps policer but that gives
> them 800mbps on each circuit.
> 
> Customer Interface 1 is a VLAN on a 10G interface
> Customer Interface 2 is a VLAN on a 1G interface
> 
> Each interface has its own /30 IP subnet with a  BGP session on each
> customer IP
> 
> Customer buys X bandwidth we want to give them X bandwidth over a pair
> of circuits.  If one circuit goes down the policer needs to be set to the X
> bandwidth the purchased.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Matt
> 
> --
> Matthew S. Crocker
> President
> Crocker Communications, Inc.
> PO BOX 710
> Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
> 
> E: [email protected]
> P: (413) 746-2760
> F: (413) 746-3704
> W: http://www.crocker.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by 
Mimecast.
 For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to