On 19/Apr/16 08:59, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
> Hi Mark > Yes am aware dear , but what made me confused that I read some > inter-operability issues in one of the forums > What my customer needs is to build generally l2 VPN circuit and he is > wondering which to follow > The main setup is ASR9K and MX which are running in different ASs , so > what inter-as option will be the more scalable and is there any > limitation from the ASR9K line card ? If you're doing straight LDP-based EoMPLS pw's, then this is vanilla. If you're doing BGP-based EoMPLS pw's that are not VPLS/EVPN, I know this is what Juniper call(ed) L2VPN. Cisco did not support this back in the day, but since they now support BGP AD for VPLS/EVPN, there might be support for this; I'm not sure. The only time we consider signaling pw's via BGP is if we're doing VPLS or EVPN, not point-to-point circuits. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
