Thanks Mark I just want to check if the configuration I pasted do work (actually am testing this in GNS3 and am not sure if it will work due to limitations)
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 19/Apr/16 08:59, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > > > Hi Mark > > Yes am aware dear , but what made me confused that I read some > > inter-operability issues in one of the forums > > What my customer needs is to build generally l2 VPN circuit and he is > > wondering which to follow > > The main setup is ASR9K and MX which are running in different ASs , so > > what inter-as option will be the more scalable and is there any > > limitation from the ASR9K line card ? > > If you're doing straight LDP-based EoMPLS pw's, then this is vanilla. > > If you're doing BGP-based EoMPLS pw's that are not VPLS/EVPN, I know > this is what Juniper call(ed) L2VPN. Cisco did not support this back in > the day, but since they now support BGP AD for VPLS/EVPN, there might be > support for this; I'm not sure. > > The only time we consider signaling pw's via BGP is if we're doing VPLS > or EVPN, not point-to-point circuits. > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
