Hi Tobias, this is the information out of the "Juniper Tech Club" in Cologne in June 2016. So not only provided to us. If needed I can verify that with Juniper.
— Sebastian Becker > Am 15.11.2017 um 16:07 schrieb Tobias Heister <li...@tobias-heister.de>: > > > Hi, > > Am 15.11.2017 um 09:13 schrieb Sebastian Becker: >> that’s not right. You need to differ between redundancy and >> non-redundancy-mode: >> With Fabric Redundancy in MX960 (SCBEs: 2 active, 1 spare): >> Premium2 Chassis (non-enhanced midplane): >> MPC5E205G >> MPC7E400G >> Premium3 Chassis (enhanced midplane): >> MPC5E240G >> MPC7E480G >> In the non-redundant mode (so all three SCBEs are online and active) you >> will not suffer from any limitation as long as all three are online. But if >> one dies you will have the limitations in a Premium2 chassis. So it depends >> on the model you want to use. We need a full redundant switching fabric so >> we have to calculate with these limitations. > > At least according to my information there is no difference in enhanced/non > enhanced for MPC7 on SCBE2 in any MX. > There is no way to get full 480G with 2+1 with SCBE2. You can get 480 in 3+0 > mode. (both on MX960) > > The first SCB* with 2+1 and Linerate for MPC7 will be SCBE3. > > But hey, your version would make more sense but all my documents and > information since the release of MPC7 say otherwise. > On the other hand there are not many customers in DE who would/should know > better :) > > -- > Kind Regards > Tobias Heister _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
