Hi, Thank you for your replies on and off-list. I'll be building this early next year.
kind regards Pshem On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 at 20:39 Wojciech Janiszewski < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pshem, > > Yes, you can. Just as I described in my previous post. > > Regards, > Wojciech > > > 22.12.2017 00:43 "Pshem Kowalczyk" <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > Hi, > > Can we use this for non-BNG functions as well? Despite a large number all > of those VLANs are 'static' customers. > > kind regards > Pshem > > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 at 23:01 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Pshem, > > > > The feature designed specifically for what you are looking for is > > pseudowire > > headend (or pseudowire headed termination PWHT on junos). I'm just really > > surprised no one mentioned it already. > > The limit is 2048 in 15.1 and should be raised to around 15k on 17.1. > > But as always you should do a fair amount of scaling and performance > > testing > > to see if it's suitable for your product scale and BW requirements. > > > > I feel your pain when I was designing Carrier Ethernet solution several > > years ago when there was no PWHE available had to use two routers at the > > head-end one to terminate PW into qinq and other with L3 to VRF. > > The only other option was bridge-domain per PW which obviously does not > > scale (well not at scales I needed anyways). > > > > adam > > > > netconsultings.com > > ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf > > > Of Pshem Kowalczyk > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 10:07 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [j-nsp] Stiching L2 to L3 on MX480 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We have an existing setup consisting of a number of ACX5k and MX480 > > > (single MPLS domain). We generally provide L2 services out of the ACXes > > and > > > L3 out of the MXes. Now, a new requirement emerged to provide L3 (with > > > features that ACX can't provide) in locations where we can't justify > the > > MX. > > > I'd like to know if it's possible to do the following (and if anything > > special is > > > required on the MX) 1. Build a L2 PWE3 taking whole port on the ACX and > > > logically terminate it on the MX 2. The logical port on the MX (I > presume > > 'lt') > > > will be used to terminate individual dot1q and QinQ services into L3 > > VPNs. > > > > > > Looking at the documentation it appears to be possible, but I'd like to > > know > > > what sort of limitations this solution might have, particularly when it > > comes to > > > QoS on the MX. > > > > > > kind regards > > > Pshem > > > _______________________________________________ > > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
