Martin T writes: >"version" statement in SLAX script is mandatory and argument for >version statement has to be either 1.0 or 1.1. Based on my testing, >1.2 works as well for example in Junos 16.1R2.11. However, is there >any difference between "version 1.0" and "version 1.1"? For example, >in Junos 16.1R2.11 one could define "version 1.0" and still use >functionality introduced in SLAX 1.1 like mutable variables or for >loops. How is "version" statement used by cscript/mgd?
At this point, it's strictly informational. I don't want to "break" a script because it uses a new feature, so I don't do enforcement. Mainly it's used for output during "slaxproc --write-version" processing, which can convert between versions. http://libslax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/distribution.html#slaxproc-the-slax-processor http://libslax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/notes.html#slax-version-information Thanks, Phil _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp