On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Phil Shafer <p...@juniper.net> wrote: > Martin T writes: >>"version" statement in SLAX script is mandatory and argument for >>version statement has to be either 1.0 or 1.1. Based on my testing, >>1.2 works as well for example in Junos 16.1R2.11. However, is there >>any difference between "version 1.0" and "version 1.1"? For example, >>in Junos 16.1R2.11 one could define "version 1.0" and still use >>functionality introduced in SLAX 1.1 like mutable variables or for >>loops. How is "version" statement used by cscript/mgd? > > At this point, it's strictly informational. I don't want to "break" > a script because it uses a new feature, so I don't do enforcement. > Mainly it's used for output during "slaxproc --write-version" > processing, which can convert between versions. > > http://libslax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/distribution.html#slaxproc-the-slax-processor > > http://libslax.readthedocs.io/en/latest/notes.html#slax-version-information > > Thanks, > Phil
Understood. Thanks! regards, Martin _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp