On 19/Apr/18 16:50, Josh Richesin wrote: > I think it is by design as well, but really defeating the purpose therefore > misleading us – the loyal customers. Juniper is an excellent platform, but > sometimes you want / need to start small and grow into a device. Like > previously mentioned, the MX104 is pretty ridiculous. I am sure Juniper lost > some loyal Juniper fans over this as the bean counters are saying, “what do > you mean it is going to cost that much more $$$ to enable the 10g ports that > are just sitting there.” In my opinion, they should have at least made it > the same cost, or maybe a little more money. It is actually cheaper for the > guys that bought MX104’s to buy a new MX204, than to upgrade the MX104 Base > effectively making the initial MX104 an expensive boat anchor.
Agreed. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
