On 1/Oct/19 18:20, Weber, Markus wrote: > > RFC6907 (7.1.8-7.1.12 - considering RFC6472) clarifies this: If > there's a covering ROA and the announcement contains an AS_SET, > it should be considered invalid (no matter if there's a ROA for > e.g. a member of the AS_SET (apparently IOS XR behaviour)). > Otherwise it's unknown (if there's an AS_SET). So what is the validator's role in this decision-making? In our validator, I see 194.45.182.0/23 from AS286 as Valid. My IOS XR boxes have accepted the route for installation. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC6907 Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC6907 Melchior Aelmans
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC... Job Snijders
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement... Melchior Aelmans
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to imple... Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to ... Jared Mauch
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC6907 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC... Job Snijders
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to imple... Job Snijders
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to ... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper... Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Jun... Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Jun... Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Jun... Job Snijders
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Jun... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Jun... Mark Tinka

