On 10/Oct/19 12:25, Weber, Markus wrote: > Still in to see if Cisco XR would not accept this. Will check again once it has done the rounds. > > Sorry again for the non j-nsp noise, should shift this conversation away > from here ... but I couldn't leave this wrong-with-first-shot code reading > uncommented. I think it's appropriate to be on j-nsp. This is going to become an issue for more networks as they deploy. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC6907 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC6907 Job Snijders
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement... Job Snijders
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to imple... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to ... Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper... Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper... Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper... Job Snijders
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC6907 Weber, Markus
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement RFC... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to implement... Melchior Aelmans
- Re: [j-nsp] Please push Juniper to imple... Mark Tinka

