Only question is if it needs stateful-ness or not (IPSEC, CGNAT etc...), but only the OP can answer that.
- CK. > On 5 Mar 2020, at 2:39 pm, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 5/Mar/20 05:32, Chris Kawchuk wrote: > >> Just to chime in --- for scale-out, wouldn't you be better offloading those >> MS-MPC functions to another box? (i.e. VM/Dedicated Appliance/etc..?). >> >> You burn slots for the MSMPC plus you burn the backplane crossing twice; so >> it's at worst a neutral proposition to externalise it and add low-cost >> non-HQoS ports to feed it. >> >> or is it the case of limited space/power/RUs/want-it-all-in-one-box? and >> yes, MS-MPC won't scale to Nx100G of workload. > > And along that line, are the services the OP needs on the MS-MPC not > available natively in the MX10000/960/480/240 line cards? > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
