I'd be +1 for this. For DC GW the main concern should be reliability and
simplicity. If you are going to bring EVPN there, then having fancy
services mixed on the same chassis may affect your uptime.
Also I'd take MX480 instead of 960 because of architecture compromises
of the latter. I'm also wondering, if MX960 fits in terms of number of
ports and capacity with some slots occupied by service cards, maybe
MX1003 + MX480 (or virtualized services) would do the job?
Kind regards,
Andrey
Chris Kawchuk писал 2020-03-04 22:32:
Just to chime in --- for scale-out, wouldn't you be better offloading
those MS-MPC functions to another box? (i.e. VM/Dedicated
Appliance/etc..?).
You burn slots for the MSMPC plus you burn the backplane crossing
twice; so it's at worst a neutral proposition to externalise it and
add low-cost non-HQoS ports to feed it.
or is it the case of limited space/power/RUs/want-it-all-in-one-box?
and yes, MS-MPC won't scale to Nx100G of workload.
- CK.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
