Hi list,

For those that have already deployed SR-MPLS, I would be curious to know which 
methodology you have followed when defining the SRGB label range? Have you just 
consciously taken an overlapping label range and then during a maintenance 
window restarted RPD so that other protocols using the overlapping dynamic 
label range would re-program, or have you managed to find a big enough 
contiguous unused label range in your network to be used as SRGB?

In our very modestly sized network, the currently running protocols (LDP, RSVP, 
BGP-LU, MP-BGP) seem to occupy the dynamic label pool 16-999999 very sparsely, 
leaving not-so-many contiguous free ranges. I'm not having particularly hard 
time in finding an unused label range in our network, but I'd just be curious 
to hear how others have managed this.

Antti
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to