I vote for static Adj-SID allocations for the SR-MPLS. It makes operations much more convenient as one might arrange a map of interface name (index) to an Adj-SID.
-- Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone). > On 11 Aug 2020, at 16:58, Andrew Alston <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Adjacency SID’s are less of a problem since they are effectively locally > significant – but again, you ideally want to track these if you are doing > static. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
