I have a backward-compatible compiler implementation of JSR-292 based
on the ECJ compiler. It's a little out of date wrt to the JSR but
hopefully it will be possible to update and release when a draft of
292 is ready.
In comparison to a library it makes it easier to implement per-call
site semantics such as caches but it obviously can't make use of the
runtime profile information in the same way that say the mlvm project
will be able to do.
Kev
On 7 Dec 2007, at 08:59, Attila Szegedi wrote:
>
> I'll keep my eye on it.
>
> Attila.
>
> On 2007.12.07., at 9:24, Alex Tkachman wrote:
>
>>
>> Even even 4 but it is not exactly my question :)
>> I think it would be good if this implementation is aligned with
>> 'invokedynamic' if anything at all done in this direction. And would
>> like to know if it is the case.
>>
>> On Dec 7, 2007 11:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Alex Tkachman wrote:
>>>> Isn't it what famous 'invokedynamic' targets for? Could anybody
>>>> please
>>>> direct me to any development done in this direction?
>>>
>>> I think we may want an implementation that works on Java 5 and 6,
>>> yes?
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>>
>>> - Charlie
>
> >
___________________________________________________________
All New Yahoo! Mail Tired of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard
protect you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
