Even even 4 but it is not exactly my question :) I think it would be good if this implementation is aligned with 'invokedynamic' if anything at all done in this direction. And would like to know if it is the case.
On Dec 7, 2007 11:20 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alex Tkachman wrote: > > Isn't it what famous 'invokedynamic' targets for? Could anybody please > > direct me to any development done in this direction? > > I think we may want an implementation that works on Java 5 and 6, yes? > > :) > > > - Charlie > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
