On Friday 20 November 2009 02:30:13 Daniel Hicks wrote: > On Nov 16, 7:33 pm, Jon Harrop <[email protected]> wrote: > > I see allocation as contention because the heap is a global shared > > resource. If you want to recover the performance of the previous > > generation of standalone languages with GCs optimized for rapid recycling > > on a single thread (e.g. OCaml) then you need to reimplement a mini-heap > > local to your thread and that is left up to the user on VMs like the JVM > > and CLR. > > I don't know of any JVM that doesn't implement a thread-local heap, at > least in the "server" implementations.
You mean a thread-local first generation, not a thread local heap. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=.
