On Monday 30 November 2009 19:04:54 Robert Fischer wrote: > Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > > This also has nothing to do with thread-local heaps, and is a result > > of CLR having fully-reified generics that can support primitive > > values. A hand-written float->float map in Java should perform as well > > or better than the generic version in CLR. > > > > Of course not having to write the primitive version by hand would be > > nice. I've written several myself over the years. > > This is what Trove is there for. It's not an actively maintained > project, but that's because it's pretty "done".
I haven't benchmarked a hand-rolled JVM-based float->float hash table against .NET's default one but the JVM is incapable of expressing value types including entries in a hash table so you're probably still taking an unnecessary performance hit. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
