On Nov 16, 7:33 pm, Jon Harrop <[email protected]> wrote:

> I see allocation as contention because the heap is a global shared resource.
> If you want to recover the performance of the previous generation of
> standalone languages with GCs optimized for rapid recycling on a single
> thread (e.g. OCaml) then you need to reimplement a mini-heap local to your
> thread and that is left up to the user on VMs like the JVM and CLR.

I don't know of any JVM that doesn't implement a thread-local heap, at
least in the "server" implementations.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=.


Reply via email to