On Nov 30, 7:04 pm, Robert Fischer <robert.fisc...@smokejumperit.com> wrote: > This is what Trove is there for. It's not an actively maintained > project, but that's because it's pretty "done".
It is actively maintained and version 3.0 is in alpha now. The API is much closer to the Java collections now. If you look at Trove, it uses two primitive arrays since Java doesn't have support for struct-like things. That means loss of data locality, which can be a big deal these days. This could be fixed for int -> int maps, but it's more complicated for other cases (e.g. int -> long, etc.). Best, Ismael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-langua...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
