Really? Awesome! ~~ Robert.
ijuma wrote: > On Nov 30, 7:04 pm, Robert Fischer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This is what Trove is there for. It's not an actively maintained >> project, but that's because it's pretty "done". >> > > It is actively maintained and version 3.0 is in alpha now. The API is > much closer to the Java collections now. If you look at Trove, it uses > two primitive arrays since Java doesn't have support for struct-like > things. That means loss of data locality, which can be a big deal > these days. This could be fixed for int -> int maps, but it's more > complicated for other cases (e.g. int -> long, etc.). > > Best, > Ismael > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "JVM Languages" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
